Abstract

Research Article

An Observational Study on Clinical Outcome and Predictors of Traumatic Cervical Injury at a Tertiary Care Facility

Surendra Saini, Ankit Prajapati, Ina Bahl*, Deepika Gehlot and Namita Prajapati

Published: 26 March, 2025 | Volume 9 - Issue 1 | Pages: 028-038

Introduction: Cervical spinal cord injuries (CSIs) account for 2% - 3% of trauma cases and 8.2% of trauma- related fatalities, making them a significant cause of disability and mortality. Effective management and timely interventions are essential to improve neurological and functional outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with CSIs and identify key predictors of neurological and functional improvement.
Materials and methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over 12 months at SMS Medical College, Jaipur, involving 100 patients with CSIs from C1 to C7 vertebrae. Patients presenting within one week of injury were included. Clinical evaluation was conducted using the ASIA scoring system, and functional outcomes were assessed with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scale. MRI findings were analyzed to classify injuries and identify critical predictors, including the presence and extent of edema and listhesis grading.
Results: Significant predictors of neurological improvement included injury type, management approach, MRI findings, extent of edema (≤ 2 vs. >2 segments), and listhesis grading. Operative management and incomplete injuries showed better outcomes. The median Barthel Index improved from 4.0 preoperatively to 7.0 at four months (p < 0.001). The mean FIM score also significantly increased from 43.25 ± 26.5 to 56.8 ± 40.75 (p < 0.05). ASIA Grades C and D demonstrated significant neurological recovery, with no grade deterioration observed.
Conclusion: Age, injury type, management strategy, MRI findings, extent of edema, and listhesis grading are key predictors of outcomes in CSIs. These findings emphasize the importance of early diagnosis, timely surgical intervention, and comprehensive management in improving neurological and functional recovery. Multicentric studies with larger cohorts are recommended for broader generalizability.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jnnd.1001107 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

References

  1. World Health Organization. Spinal cord injury: Fact sheet. WHO Newsroom. 16 April 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cord-injury#:~:text=Key%20facts,violence%2C%20and%20are%20thus%20preventable.
  2. Pandrich MJ, Demetriades AK. Prevalence of concomitant traumatic cranio-spinal injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2020;43(1):69–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-0988-3
  3. Stewart AN, Jones KB, Gensel JC. Improving translatability of spinal cord injury research by including age as a demographic variable. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:017153. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.1017153
  4. Jaiswal SK, Ojha BK, Jaiswal S, Bajaj A. Clinical outcome and predictors of traumatic cervical injury: A prospective observational study. Asian J Neurosurg. 2024;19(4):641–649. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788062
  5. Tarawneh AM, D’Aquino D, Hilis A, Eisa A, Quraishi NA. Can MRI findings predict the outcome of cervical spinal cord injury? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(10):2457–2464. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06511-7
  6. Boldin C, Raith J, Fankhauser F, Haunschmid C, Schwantzer G, Schweighofer F. Predicting neurologic recovery in cervical spinal cord injury with postoperative MR imaging. Spine. 2006;31(5):554–559. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000201274.59427.a4
  7. Yousefifard M, Hashemi B, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Ultra-early spinal decompression surgery can improve neurological outcome of complete cervical SCI: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2022;159:e410–e422.
  8. Martínez-Pérez R, Fuentes F, Alemany VS. Subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: Is it most appropriate for classifying cervical injury? Neural Regen Res. 2015 Sep;10(9):1416-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.165508
  9. Srinivas B, Rajesh A, Purohit A. Factors affecting outcome of acute cervical spine injury: A prospective study. Asian J Neurosurg. 2017;12(03):416-423. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.180942
  10. Hitti FL, Mcshane BJ, Yang AI, Rinehart C, Albayar A, Branche M, et al. Predictors of neurological outcome following subaxial cervical spine trauma. Cureus. 2019 Dec 17;11(12):e6402. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6402
  11. Tsalimas G, Alvanos D, Kalmantos T. Dysphagia as a postoperative complication of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): A literature review. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e27798.

Figures:

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?